WebThe Chamber urged the California Supreme Court to reject this view, arguing the court of appeal’s decision distorts the jurisprudence of specific jurisdiction in a way that significantly erodes the limits on general jurisdiction that the U.S. Supreme Court had reaffirmed in Daimler Corp. v. Bauman. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in California. It is part of a group of six cases decided since 2011 that have greatly changed the application of personal jurisdiction.

SCOTUS Rules Out-of-State Plaintiffs’ Access to State Courts …

WebMar 1, 2024 · Superior Court Home Perspectives Due Process Limits on Nationwide Class Actions Post-BMS v. The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling has led many courts to dismiss nationwide class actions filed against non-resident defendants, and those decisions that have rejected defendants’ jurisdiction arguments are fundamentally flawed outliers. WebThe California Superior Court denied BMS's motion to quash service of summons on the nonresidents' claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, concluding that BMS's … mcdougall upcoming auctions

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court for the County of San ...

WebIn the recent decision, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS) v. Superior Court (2024) ___ US ____, the Supreme Court followed a string of recent decisions by further limiting out of state plaintiffs’ access to courts in California. The decision is based on the history of cases from Penoyer v. Neff, International Shoe and their progeny, and the 14th Amendment … WebThe California Superior Court denied BMS’s motion to quash ser-vice of summons on the nonresidents’ claims for lack of personal ju-risdiction, concluding that BMS’s extensive … WebBristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County (BMS), 137 S. Ct. 1773 (2024), sent shock waves through the class action bar, leading defendants to contest ... BMS, the court stated that class and mass tort actions are different in kind, including because “a class action has different ... lgw duty free